PET vs PP For Food Packaging

- Apr 01, 2026-

core Comparison

 

 

Property PET PP
Transparency & Gloss Crystal-clear, glass-like gloss, perfect for retail display Semi-transparent/opaque (natural milky white), lower gloss; can be made clear but not as bright as PET
Heat Resistance Max safe temp: 60–70°C; softens/deforms above 75°C; NOT microwave-safe; cold-resistant to -40°C Max safe temp: 110–120°C; withstands boiling/steam sterilization; microwave-safe; cold-resistant to -20°C (brittle below -10°C)
Barrier Properties Excellent oxygen/moisture barrier (extends shelf life for oils, snacks, beverages) Poor oxygen barrier (good for moisture only); better for dry/hot foods not sensitive to oxidation
Mechanical Strength Rigid, high tensile strength, good drop resistance (1.5m drop test stable); brittle at extreme low temps Flexible, tough better impact resistance for heavy/stacked packaging
Food Safety Food-grade; avoid high heat Food-grade; safe for hot filling, microwave, and direct food contact
Recyclability Widely recycled Recyclable but less consistent infrastructure; single-material PP improves recyclability
Cost Slightly higher raw material cost Lower cost; better for high-volume, functional packaging

 

Typical Food Packaging Applications

 

 

PET Best For

Cold/chilled foods: Salads, sushi, fresh fruit, deli meats, desserts, ready-to-eat cold meals

Shelf-stable snacks: Cookies, candy, nuts, dried fruit (high barrier for freshness)

Clear clamshells, thermoformed trays, bottles, jars (display-focused)

PP Best For

Hot food & takeout: Microwaveable lunch boxes, soup containers, hot meal trays.

Dairy: Yogurt cups

Frozen food: Microwaveable frozen dinners, ice cream tubs

You Might Also Like